Decision letter (Initial Submission) 决定函（初次提交）
IEEE Access - Decision on Manuscript ID Access-2023-34567
IEEE Access - 关于稿件 ID Access-2023-34567 的决定
IEEE Access - 关于稿件 ID Access-2023-34567 的决定
From: 从：
christos.anagnostopoulos@glasgow.ac.uk
To: 到：
feifei0001feifei@163.com
CC: 抄送：
feifei0001feifei@163.com, dpengzhanchi@126.com
15-Nov-2023 2023 年 11 月 15 日
Dear Prof. MIN: 尊敬的闵教授：
I am writing to you regarding manuscript # Access-2023-34567 entitled "A Topic Modeling Method based on Variational Autoencoder" which you submitted to IEEE Access.
我写信给您是关于您提交给 IEEE Access 的题为“基于变分自动编码器的主题建模方法”的稿件 # Access-2023-34567。
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. Unfortunately, we will not accept resubmissions of this article.
鉴于这封信底部的审稿人的批评，您的手稿尚未被推荐在 IEEE Access上发表。 不幸的是，我们不会接受这篇文章的重新提交。
Thank you for considering IEEE Access for the publication of your research.
感谢您考虑通过 IEEE Access发表您的研究成果。
Sincerely, 真挚地，
Dr. Christos Anagnostopoulos
克里斯托·阿格诺斯托普洛斯博士
Associate Editor, IEEE Access
IEEE Access副主编
Reviewers' Comments to Author:
审稿人对作者的评论：
Reviewer: 1 审稿人：1
Additional Questions: 附加问题：
Please confirm that you have reviewed all relevant files, including supplementary files and any author response files, which can be found in the "View Author's Response" link above (author responses will only appear for resubmissions): Yes, all files have been reviewed
请确认您已审阅所有相关文件，包括补充文件和所有作者回复文件，这些文件可在上面的“查看作者回复”链接中找到（作者回复仅在重新提交时显示）：是的，所有文件均已审核
1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: yes
1）论文对知识体系是否有贡献？：是
2) Is the paper technically sound?: yes
2）这篇论文在技术上是否可靠？：是
3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: yes
3）主题是否全面呈现：是
4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: yes
4) 提供的参考资料是否适用且充分？： 是
5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No
5) 是否有不适合所讨论主题的参考文献？： 否
5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.:
5a) 如果是，请指出应删除哪些引用：
Reviewer: 2 审稿人：2
Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit)
建议：拒绝（不鼓励重新提交）
Comments: 评论：
1. The level of innovation in the article is very limited
1.文章创新程度非常有限
2. In addition, apart from redefining the model, the author seems to have made no modifications to any other parts
2.此外，除了重新定义模型之外，作者似乎没有对任何其他部分进行修改
Additional Questions: 附加问题：
Please confirm that you have reviewed all relevant files, including supplementary files and any author response files, which can be found in the "View Author's Response" link above (author responses will only appear for resubmissions): Yes, all files have been reviewed
请确认您已审阅所有相关文件，包括补充文件和所有作者回复文件，这些文件可在上面的“查看作者回复”链接中找到（作者回复仅在重新提交时显示）：是的，所有文件均已审核
1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Not yet
1）这篇论文对知识体系有贡献吗？：还没有
2) Is the paper technically sound?: Not yet
2）这篇论文技术上可靠吗？：还没有
3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Not yet
3）主题是否全面呈现：还没有
4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Not yet
4) 提供的参考资料是否适用且充分？： 还没有
5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No
5) 是否有不适合所讨论主题的参考文献？： 否
5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.:
5a) 如果是，请指出应删除哪些引用：
If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Sridam Malo s.malo@ieee.org
如果您有任何疑问，请联系文章管理员：Sridam Malo 先生 s.malo@ieee.org
Dear Prof. MIN: 尊敬的闵教授：
I am writing to you regarding manuscript # Access-2023-34567 entitled "A Topic Modeling Method based on Variational Autoencoder" which you submitted to IEEE Access.
我写信给您是关于您提交给 IEEE Access 的题为“基于变分自动编码器的主题建模方法”的稿件 # Access-2023-34567。
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. Unfortunately, we will not accept resubmissions of this article.
鉴于这封信底部的审稿人的批评，您的手稿尚未被推荐在 IEEE Access上发表。 不幸的是，我们不会接受这篇文章的重新提交。
Thank you for considering IEEE Access for the publication of your research.
感谢您考虑通过 IEEE Access发表您的研究成果。
Sincerely, 真挚地，
Dr. Christos Anagnostopoulos
克里斯托·阿格诺斯托普洛斯博士
Associate Editor, IEEE Access
IEEE Access副主编
Reviewers' Comments to Author:
审稿人对作者的评论：
Reviewer: 1 审稿人：1
Additional Questions: 附加问题：
Please confirm that you have reviewed all relevant files, including supplementary files and any author response files, which can be found in the "View Author's Response" link above (author responses will only appear for resubmissions): Yes, all files have been reviewed
请确认您已审阅所有相关文件，包括补充文件和所有作者回复文件，这些文件可在上面的“查看作者回复”链接中找到（作者回复仅在重新提交时显示）：是的，所有文件均已审核
1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: yes
1）论文对知识体系是否有贡献？：是
2) Is the paper technically sound?: yes
2）这篇论文在技术上是否可靠？：是
3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: yes
3）主题是否全面呈现：是
4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: yes
4) 提供的参考资料是否适用且充分？： 是
5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No
5) 是否有不适合所讨论主题的参考文献？： 否
5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.:
5a) 如果是，请指出应删除哪些引用：
Reviewer: 2 审稿人：2
Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit)
建议：拒绝（不鼓励重新提交）
Comments: 评论：
1. The level of innovation in the article is very limited
1.文章创新程度非常有限
2. In addition, apart from redefining the model, the author seems to have made no modifications to any other parts
2.此外，除了重新定义模型之外，作者似乎没有对任何其他部分进行修改
Additional Questions: 附加问题：
Please confirm that you have reviewed all relevant files, including supplementary files and any author response files, which can be found in the "View Author's Response" link above (author responses will only appear for resubmissions): Yes, all files have been reviewed
请确认您已审阅所有相关文件，包括补充文件和所有作者回复文件，这些文件可在上面的“查看作者回复”链接中找到（作者回复仅在重新提交时显示）：是的，所有文件均已审核
1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Not yet
1）这篇论文对知识体系有贡献吗？：还没有
2) Is the paper technically sound?: Not yet
2）这篇论文技术上可靠吗？：还没有
3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Not yet
3）主题是否全面呈现：还没有
4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Not yet
4) 提供的参考资料是否适用且充分？： 还没有
5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No
5) 是否有不适合所讨论主题的参考文献？： 否
5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.:
5a) 如果是，请指出应删除哪些引用：
If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Sridam Malo s.malo@ieee.org
如果您有任何疑问，请联系文章管理员：Sridam Malo 先生 s.malo@ieee.org