Erdoğan's advisor targets the Constitutional Court, says it creates systemic crisis
埃尔多安的顾问抨击宪法法院,称其制造系统性危机
总统首席顾问穆罕默德-乌库姆(Mehmet Uçum)声称,宪法法院对 Can Atalay 案的判决违反了《宪法》。"他说:"宪法法院正在毫不犹豫地竭尽全力缩小总统令的专属范围(总统制的必然要求),并制造系统性危机。
![Erdoğan's advisor targets the Constitutional Court, says it creates systemic crisis](https://static.bianet.org/haber/2024/01/04/cumhurbaskani-basdanismani-ucum-aym-yi-hedef-aldi-sistem-krizi-uretiyor.jpg)
Presidential Chief Advisor Mehmet Uçum targeted the Constitutional Court (AYM), which issued the second violation decision regarding Can Atalay, a member of the Turkey Workers' Party (TİP), who was elected as a Member of Parliament in the general elections on May 14, 2023, but has nevertheless not been released from the prison.
总统首席顾问穆罕默德-乌库姆(Mehmet Uçum)将矛头指向了宪法法院(AYM),该法院针对土耳其工人党(TİP)成员坎-阿塔莱(Can Atalay)做出了第二次违规裁决,坎-阿塔莱在2023年5月14日的大选中当选为国会议员,但至今仍未从监狱中获释。
The local court, instead of releasing Atalay in accordance with the AYM's decision, had forwarded the case to the 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation which declared the Constitutional Court's decision as "unlawful" and declined to comply with it.
地方法院没有按照 AYM 的决定释放 Atalay,而是将此案转交给最高上诉法院第三刑事庭,后者宣布宪法法院的决定 "非法",拒绝执行。
"Constitutional Court is violating the Constitution"
"宪法法院违反宪法"
Uçum has, in statements that he made on his social media posts today (December 4) claimed that the Constitutional Court has not respected the constitution since its establishment. He wrote that the 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation did the right thing, arguing that the Constitutional Court is the one violating the constitution.
乌库姆今天(12 月 4 日)在其社交媒体上发表声明,声称宪法法院自成立以来就没有尊重过宪法。他写道,最高上诉法院第三刑事庭的做法是正确的,并认为宪法法院才是违反宪法的一方。
Uçum, claiming that the Constitutional Court has harmed Turkey with its violation decisions, made a reference to the closure case against People's Democratic Party (HDP) without explicitly naming it. In his statement, he said, "In the past, the Constitutional Court closed parties it ideologically disagreed with and restricted their political participation rights. Today, it doesn't close a political party that is under the influence of terrorist elements, even acting in organic unity with a terrorist organization. Moreover, it enables financial support, including special election funds, to be provided to this party, which is evident not to participate in elections, thus opening the door to indirect financing of terrorism."
乌楚姆声称宪法法院的违规裁决损害了土耳其,他提到了针对人民民主党(HDP)的关闭案件,但没有明确点名。他在发言中说:"过去,宪法法院关闭了它在意识形态上不同意的政党,限制了它们的政治参与权。如今,宪法法院不会关闭受恐怖分子影响的政党,甚至不会关闭与恐怖组织有机联合的政党。此外,它还允许向这个政党提供财政支持,包括特别选举资金,而这个政党显然不会参加选举,从而为间接资助恐怖主义打开了方便之门"。
Facing the risk of closure, HDP had entered the elections under the Green and Left Party (YSP) which later changed its name to DEM Party.
面对被关闭的风险,人民民主党以绿色和左翼党(YSP)的名义参加了选举,该党后来更名为 DEM 党。
Uçum, in his social media account X, stated the following:
乌库姆在其社交媒体账户 X 中发表了如下声明:
"The Constitutional Court (AYM) in Turkey has been a structure marked by reckless disregard for the Constitution and audacious legal violations since its establishment. Looking at the recent past, we can initially list the following: The AYM flagrantly violated constitutional provisions and subjected the constitutional jurisdiction to one of the most shameful decisions in history, the 367 scandal. It virtually eliminated the Parliament's authority to elect the President with a decision akin to a coup.
"土耳其宪法法院(AYM)自成立以来,一直是一个肆无忌惮地无视《宪法》、胆大妄为地违反法律的机构。回顾最近的历史,我们可以初步列举如下:土耳其大国民议会公然违反宪法规定,将宪法管辖权置于历史上最无耻的决定--367 丑闻--之下。它实际上取消了议会选举总统的权力,其决定类似于政变。
"Despite lacking the authority to substantively examine constitutional amendments, the AYM, influenced by those claiming that the constitutional amendment passed with 411 votes led to chaos, usurped the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution and annulled the regulation on freedom of dress."
"尽管缺乏对宪法修正案进行实质性审查的权力,但受那些声称以 411 票通过的宪法修正案导致混乱的人的影响,AYM 篡夺了议会修改宪法的权力,废除了关于着装自由的规定"。
"AYM obstructed democratic governments"
"AYM 阻碍民主政府
"The Constitutional Court (AYM), despite lacking the authority for substantive examination, caused the takeover of the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK) by the FETÖ (Fethullahist Terrorist Organization) gang by annulling the provision 'each voter votes for one candidate' in the 2010 constitutional amendment."
"宪法法院(AYM)尽管无权进行实质性审查,却通过废除 2010 年宪法修正案中'每位选民投票选举一名候选人'的规定,导致最高法官和检察官委员会(HSYK)被法图拉恐怖组织(FETÖ)帮派接管"。
"For years, the AYM obstructed democratic governments by canceling laws that, despite being in line with the Constitution, it deemed inappropriate solely based on an ideological perspective unrelated to positive law. It supported illegitimate internal powers, and hampered the development of our country."
"多年来,AYM 阻挠民主政府,取消那些尽管符合《宪法》但它认为不合适的法律,其唯一依据是与实在法无关的意识形态观点。它支持不合法的内部权力,阻碍了我们国家的发展"。
"By closing various political parties established as a requirement of the right to political participation for ideological reasons, the AYM inflicted severe damage to our democracy. The AYM examined the closure case against the ruling party (AKP) and applied sanctions against it based on flimsy evidence and false news on fake websites."
"AYM出于意识形态原因关闭了作为政治参与权要求而成立的各种政党,对我们的民主造成了严重破坏。土耳其青年运动审查了针对执政党(AKP)的关闭案件,并根据站不住脚的证据和虚假网站上的假新闻对其实施制裁"。
"Turned into a tool for creating legal chaos"
"沦为制造法律混乱的工具"
"After the individual application system was introduced, the Constitutional Court (AYM), positioning itself as if it were above the Court of Cassation and the Council of State in violation of the Constitution, committed numerous legal violations and continues to do so. AYM intervenes in court decisions in almost every domain and beyond constitutional limits, almost turning into a tool for creating legal chaos. All courts, including the Court of Cassation and the Council of State, have reached a point of rebellion against the AYM's both unconstitutional and legally ignorant violation decisions."
"在引入个人申请制度后,宪法法院(AYM)违反《宪法》,将自己定位为高于最高上诉法院和国务委员会,犯下了许多违法行为,并且仍在继续。宪法法院几乎干预了所有领域的法院判决,超出了宪法规定的范围,几乎成了制造法律混乱的工具。包括最高上诉法院和国务委员会在内的所有法院都已达到了反抗 AYM 违反宪法和法律的无知决定的地步"。
"AYM trying to narrow scope of Presidential Decrees"
"AYM试图缩小总统令的范围"
"Despite its constitutional duty, the Constitutional Court (AYM) ignores applications claiming that the reasonable duration of the trial has been exceeded due to the high number of applications, even if this causes citizens to suffer."
"宪法法院(AYM)不顾其宪法职责,对声称由于申请数量过多而超出合理审判期限的申请置之不理,即使这会给公民带来痛苦"。
"However, the same AYM occasionally prioritizes applications that contribute to legal chaos in both individual applications and norm controls, not hesitating to make unconstitutional decisions.
"然而,同一个 AYM 有时会优先考虑那些在个人申请和规范控制方面造成法律混乱的申请,毫不犹豫地做出违宪的决定。
"In this context, the AYM does not refrain from doing its utmost to narrow the exclusive scope of Presidential Decrees, a necessity of the presidential system, and to create a systemic crisis. While the AYM occasionally makes accurate decisions, these decisions unfortunately seem to be the result of an effort to strike a balance influenced by public opinion and internal court dynamics."
"在这种情况下,法院不遗余力地缩小总统令的专属范围(这是总统制的必然要求),并制造系统性危机。虽然仲裁院偶尔也会做出准确的裁决,但遗憾的是,这些裁决似乎是受公众舆论和法院内部动态影响而努力寻求平衡的结果"。
"There are judges among the members of the Constitutional Court who take a stance in favor of the Constitution and law against unconstitutional practices, decisions violating the law, exceeding authorities, judicial activism, and the desire for a regime of constitutional judges (juristocracy). Their existence is indeed valuable. However, ultimately, the Constitutional Court establishes a record not with dissenting opinions of historical value, but with decisions made by the majority. The subject of criticism and objection is this track record of the Constitutional Court. To free the Constitutional Court from this state, there is a need for legal and, ultimately, constitutional amendments."
"在宪法法院成员中,有一些法官站在宪法和法律的立场上,反对违宪做法、违反法律的裁决、越权行为、司法能动主义以及建立宪法法官制度(法学家制度)的愿望。他们的存在的确很有价值。然而,宪法法院最终建立的记录不是具有历史价值的不同意见,而是多数人做出的决定。宪法法院的这一记录正是批评和反对的对象。为了使宪法法院摆脱这种状态,有必要进行法律修订,最终是宪法修订"。
"Court of Cassation is fulfilling requirements of the Constitution"
"最高上诉法院正在履行《宪法》要求
"The 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation is fulfilling the requirements of the Constitution. It is the Constitutional Court (AYM) that is violating the Constitution! The Constitutional Court (AYM) continues to issue decisions that blatantly contradict both Article 14 of the Constitution and the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CMK) regarding the immunity of a convicted member of parliament, just as it did in the past."
"最高上诉法院第三刑事庭正在履行《宪法》的要求。违反《宪法》的是宪法法院(AYM)!宪法法院(AYM)继续做出与《宪法》第 14 条和《刑事诉讼法》(CMK)关于被定罪议员豁免权的规定公然相悖的裁决,就像过去一样"。
"Not adhering to the arbitrary decisions of the Constitutional Court by the 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation is a defense of the Constitution and legal security. In other words, not complying with the decisions of the Constitutional Court is not a violation of the Constitution; on the contrary, it is fulfilling the requirements of the Constitution."
"不遵守最高上诉法院第三刑事庭对宪法法院的任意裁决是对《宪法》和法律安全的捍卫。换言之,不遵守宪法法院的裁决并不违反《宪法》;相反,这是在履行《宪法》的要求"。
"The decision of the 3rd Criminal Chamber not to comply is an exposure of the unconstitutional and arbitrary decisions of the Constitutional Court (AYM), which does not recognize the constitution and the institution of retrial. If the arbitrariness of the Constitutional Court is not curbed, these problems will persist. With its two non-compliance decisions, the 3rd Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation has intervened against the arbitrariness of the Constitutional Court and defended the positive legal order. This is an extremely valuable legal stance."
"第三刑事分庭不遵守的决定暴露了宪法法院(AYM)的违宪和武断决定,它不承认宪法和重审制度。如果宪法法院的任意性得不到遏制,这些问题将继续存在。最高上诉法院第三刑事庭通过其两项不遵守判决的裁决,对宪法法院的任意性进行了干预,并捍卫了积极的法律秩序。这是一个极其宝贵的法律立场"。
"In general, it is an important goal to eliminate the Constitutional Court's structure, which has become impaired by reckless disregard for the Constitution and audacious legal violations since its establishment, and to restructure it within a new constitution. It is crucial for the Constitutional Court to function as one of our national judicial bodies in every aspect to strengthen our national judiciary, freeing itself entirely from Western and neo-liberal deviations." (RT/PE)
"总体而言,消除宪法法院的结构是一个重要目标,因为自其成立以来,由于肆无忌惮地无视《宪法》和大胆违反法律,宪法法院的结构已经受损,在新宪法的范围内对其进行重组是一个重要目标。至关重要的是,宪法法院要在各个方面作为我们的国家司法机构之一发挥作用,以加强我们的国家司法机构,使其完全摆脱西方和新自由主义的偏差"。(RT/PE)
今日头条